Skip to main content

Indicator: Equitable placement in rigorous coursework

Definition

Students from various demographic subgroups are proportionally represented in rigorous courses and programs.

RECOMMENDED METRIC(S)

Differences in the participation rates for students from key demographic subgroups in rigorous courses and programs relative to those students’ representation in their school population as a whole, including opportunities, such as the following: 
•    Gifted and talented programs
•    Algebra I in middle school
•    Higher-level math courses in high school (that is, Algebra II, calculus)
•    Early college courses (AP, International Baccalaureate [IB], and dual enrollment) 

Type(s) of Data Needed

Administrative data; student transcript data

Why it matters

Even when schools offer rigorous coursework and other programs, students are not always equitably selected or encouraged to participate. For example, even among students with high standardized test scores, Black students are referred less often to gifted programs than other students, particularly when they are taught by non-Black teachers.  Concerns about inequitable placement extend into middle school and high school. As another example, although 80 percent of students nationwide have access to Algebra I in middle school—a gateway to higher-level math coursework in high school—just 13 percent of Latino students and 12 percent of Black students take Algebra I as 8th graders.  However, when placement policies in one district shifted from using subjective criteria to using student test scores, disparities in participation in Algebra I in 8th grade by income, race, and ethnicity were greatly reduced.  Disparities in participation in early college coursework can also reflect inequitable placement. Even in high schools that offer 18 or more Advanced Placement (AP) courses, enrollment in AP courses is significantly lower among Black, Latino, and Indigenous students than their White and Asian peers.

What to know about measurement

Schools regularly record student-level course and program enrollment as part of their regular operations. Additionally, districts report school-level data to Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) on multiple measures of student course enrollment, including the number of students enrolled in at least one dual enrollment program, the IB program, at least one AP course (including at least one science, technology, engineering, or mathematics [STEM] course), Algebra I, geometry, and computer science. We encourage framework users to examine data on equitable participation alongside data on access to college preparatory coursework and access to early college coursework, as the availability of coursework is an important driver of participation, along with inequitable placement.

Source frameworks

Access to or participation in rigorous coursework appeared in three frameworks reviewed for this report. Our recommendation to emphasize equitable access is consistent with work by the National Research Council, which recommends measuring “disparities in access to and enrollment in rigorous coursework.”

References

The framework's recommendations are based on syntheses of existing research. Please see the framework report for a list of works cited.