Evidence-based Practice: Response to Intervention Breadcrumb Home Evidence-based Practices Response To Intervention Definition Response to Intervention (RTI) is an early detection and prevention strategy that combines universal screening for all students with instructional interventions targeted to students who need additional support. Universal screening is a critical first step in identifying students at risk of falling behind. The WWC recommends screening all students at the beginning of each school year and again in the middle of the year.1, 2, 3 The WWC recommends that once students have been identified for support, schools should select an intervention that provides an explicit instructional focus to meet each student’s identified learning needs. The greater the instructional need, the more intensive the intervention should be in the size of instructional groups and amount of instructional time. Students who score below benchmark should receive intensive instruction in small homogenous groups ranging from three to four students, using curricula that address foundational skills, and should meet approximately three to five times per week for 20 to 40 minutes. The WWC is a good source for examples of specific instructional intervention programs that have proven effective for particular subjects, grades, and student needs (for example, Leveled Literacy Intervention4 for struggling readers in K–2 or Read1805 for struggling readers in grades 4–10). Intensive instructional support may need to be provided by trained specialists. Related indicators Outcomes & Milestones Early grades on track Math and reading proficiency in grade 3 6th grade on track Math and reading proficiency in grade 8 9th grade on track Grade point average Math and reading proficiency in high school E-W System Conditions Teachers’ contributions to student learning growth Institutions’ contributions to student outcomes Related essential questions Do students have access to quality, full-day kindergarten? Are students demonstrating satisfactory academic progress, consistent attendance, and positive behavior to be considered on track in the early grades? Do students have access to quality school environments, including quality curricula and instruction, experienced teachers, effective leaders, and adequate funding? Are students meeting reading and math benchmarks in grades 3 and 8? Are teachers and schools making sufficient contributions to academic growth for students? Are students demonstrating satisfactory academic progress, consistent attendance, and positive behavior to be considered on track for high school graduation? References 1What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2009a). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention (RTI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/32What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2009b). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RTI) for elementary and middle schools. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/23What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/84What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2017b). Leveled literacy intervention. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/EvidenceSnapshot/6795What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) (2016a). Read 180. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Intervention/742